QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by miked1978:
__PRESENT

Define limited. 7 teams would have immediate interest and all it takes is one team to drive up the price. Not all of them will be willing to pay $60 million but like i said all it takes is 1 team and that's the leverage he has. If you got a team like the Browns willing to give a record breaking guaranteed contract to a sexual predator you bet you butt someone would be willing to give squeaky clean Brock Purdy a nice fat contract.

Titans
Browns
Giants
Jets
Colts
Saints
Raiders

__PRESENT

nfl draft will fill 2-3 openings. then you have daniel jones, russ, fields, cousins, rodgers, carr and presumably if you include colts, richardson all doing musical chairs. there are actually more than enough QBs to go around. teams like scheme and relationship fits. for example, kellen moore with saints, he may want to work with cooper rush or kenny pickett. those are guys he has coached. so i see them in play and nfl draft in play also.

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Just the facts: Brock Purdy has been the NFL's most efficient QB since joining the league in 2022, tops in EPA/play + success rate. He's also only 25. Young and Montana didn't deliver their most efficient football until Age 33.

Full article @sfstandard: https://t.co/RZQ4DGQoBU pic.twitter.com/7a1zB2DXrn

— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) February 19, 2025

Ya but he doesn't have a pLuS aRm

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Just the facts: Brock Purdy has been the NFL's most efficient QB since joining the league in 2022, tops in EPA/play + success rate. He's also only 25. Young and Montana didn't deliver their most efficient football until Age 33.

Full article @sfstandard: https://t.co/RZQ4DGQoBU pic.twitter.com/7a1zB2DXrn

— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) February 19, 2025

Ya but he doesn't have a pLuS aRm

it's all team stats at the end of the day. if you play in a loaded offense with shanahan on the playsheet you are probably gonna look efficient. jimmy i believe is top 10 rated in history, for example.

I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:
I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

the key is get the early years at reasonable cap hit and get an out in the deal before the real cap hits set in

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:

I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:
I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

I hate when people say Brock regressed. Like not having his top weapons on offense available the majority of the season wasn't a factor. It's a team sport, not an individual one. Just frustrating sometimes always having to defend my boy.

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:
I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

That's not going to work.

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:
I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

That's not going to work.

I love how this 30-35 number is the one always being thrown around for the low-ball.

Where did you guys come up with this? Why not just say your going to pay him 15-25mill a year and use that as the number? Just say he's not worth that big a part of the cap and 15-25 is plenty. Its more than any of the backups make so he should take it right?

Nevermind that it's less than most WRS and good DEs. Purdy not worth being paid more than them.

It's just funny to me this 30-35 number keeps being tossed out. It's equally as laughable as 15-25 so why not save more?

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Oscar8325:
It's not just me saying it, several ESPN analyst have said if he was a free agent the market for him would be limited. I'm no GM but I'd do 5 year $225 and half of that guaranteed.

Everybody talks s**t about Brock. They are way off.

Saying what they think someone's value is is not talking sh** though. It's just an opinion. Saying he "stinks" is talking sh**.

Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:
I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

noted

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:
I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

That's not going to work.

I love how this 30-35 number is the one always being thrown around for the low-ball.

Where did you guys come up with this? Why not just say your going to pay him 15-25mill a year and use that as the number? Just say he's not worth that big a part of the cap and 15-25 is plenty. Its more than any of the backups make so he should take it right?

Nevermind that it's less than most WRS and good DEs. Purdy not worth being paid more than them.

It's just funny to me this 30-35 number keeps being tossed out. It's equally as laughable as 15-25 so why not save more?

i think he's mentioned baker mayfield
he just went for 4500 and 41 TDs and makes 100m over 3, or 33m aav.

i see the point he is making. if the player wants to say dak makes this, the club should be able to say well baker makes that, and he had a better year than you did

Baker outperforming his contract doesn't mean Brock should get what Baker gets

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

i think he's mentioned baker mayfield
he just went for 4500 and 41 TDs and makes 100m over 3, or 33m aav.

i see the point he is making. if the player wants to say dak makes this, the club should be able to say well baker makes that, and he had a better year than you did

I'm sure they will use more than two comps.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:

I'd still just give Brock 30-35 million even with the salary cap increase. He regressed last year and is still under contract.

noted

You think that's actually possible?